Abstract:The summer heavy precipitation in Northeast China is characterized by its localized nature, short duration, and high intensity. Such extreme weather events have always been a challenge for numerical forecasting. The traditional precipitation skill scores are often ineffective for verifying heavy precipitation processes in Northeast China due to the "double penalty" effect caused by minor spatial and temporal discrepancies. The ensemble precipitation spatial verification technique can effectively improve the validity of precipitation assessment. In this paper, the heavy precipitation events in Northeast China during the summer of 2018 were categorized into westward trough, shear line, and low vortex types,with typical precipitation cases selected for each weather process.A comparative analysis involving process analysis, ensemble equitable threat score (EETS), and the developed ensemble precipitation spatial verification method was conducted.The results indicate that EETS have certain evaluative capabilities when the precipitation area is extensive and the intensity is high. However, when heavy precipitation is scattered and point rainfall dominates, the inherent evaluation disadvantages become evident. Specifically, it becomes challenging to achieve a perfect match between forecasts and observations in point-to-point verification, leading to significant reliability and discernibility issues in the evaluation conclusions due to the serious "double penalty" problem. However, the ensemble precipitation spatial verification method can effectively compensate for these shortcomings, significantly enhancing the discernibility of the assessment.